Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
A systematic review should follow rigorous standards because the validity of a systematic review's conclusions directly depends on its methodological validity. Several important standards are listed below; these standards provide guidance on all aspects of the review. Following one of these standards should ensure the validity of your study design.
Guides & Standards
These four major guides will help with the process of conducting a systematic review:
The Equator Network (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparence Of health Research) contains a searchable database of reporting guidelines and also links to other resources relevant to research reporting.
Chat with a Librarian
Lister Hill Library
More Guides, Standards, Tools
- MOOSE: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. Includes a proposed reporting checklist for authors, editors, and reviewers of meta-analyses of observational studies.
- Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS). The ROBIS tool is used to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews. It can be used by researchers to conduct a review of systematic reviews, or by those who want to avoid bias in their own systematic reviews.
- AMSTAR, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews.
SR Toolbox is a searchable catalog of software tools that can be used to support the systematic review process. The SR Toolbox also includes checklists, guidelines and reporting standards.